What is really behind the foreclosures?

Does anyone remember when about a year ago, all of the credit providers suddenly upped significantly the required minimum payment? It was for our own good, of course. Because after all, if we made only minimum payments, then it would take forever for us to pay off debt!

Of course, if you dig back, it was the big push to stop predatory lending (the ridiculously high interest rates). The problem is, everything you do to try to curtail big money banks, they find a way to get the money from other routes - like raising the monthly payments, like raising fees on everything, you get the picture.

But what do you think happens when people who are barely able to make their minimum payments suddenly have to make DOUBLE the minimum? Something has to give. Because no one has been getting raises that keep up with inflation as it is, not to mention the skyrocketing fuel and food prices.

Suddenly people who were making the minimum payments to get by had to find other ways to pay the levels (probably by borrowing more money), and got to a point where they couldn't pay all their bills. All of this was done to "protect" consumers, because minimum payments would take forever to pay off a debt. And let's not forget - it's even harder now to file bankruptcy, so it's uncontrolled foreclosures, worsening credit woes, depression, suicide.. (and yes, at least one person has committed suicide because of foreclosure).

And suddenly everyone's wondering why people can't pay their mortgages. Inflation has gone up significantly thanks to Al Gore and his terrorism, because food is scarce, gas is scarcer, and the dems won't allow more drilling.

Squashers of religious freedom

Lately it seems that no one is allowed to criticize any religion except for Christianity. Look at what has happened to Bridget Bardot because she was speaking out against the senseless sacrificing of sheep, she was convicted of racial hatred (a source).

I happened to stumble across a term in a book I was reading this morning, which referred to the "cultural mandate". Defined as "God's command to be fruitful and multiply, to rule and subdue the earth" source, p. 31

Not content to take the author's word for it, I went directly to the source. My NIV*KJV Parallel Bible, Genesis 1:28.

KJV: And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth on the earth.

NIV: God blessed them and said to them, "Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air and over every living creature that moves on the ground."

Do you see why anyone who embraces the cult of Al Gore cannot allow the Bible or Christianity to flourish? Both versions use the word "subdue" - which can be defined as conquer, overpower by superior force, vanquish, cultivate (source).

Why, that would mean that we humans are supposed to reproduce, and hold dominion over the creatures of the world. That means we can use the natural resources of the world. That humans are considered the superior race, not the animals on the planet. We are not to sacrifice humans, our health, our food, and our livelihood, to save a population of polar bears that aren't even endangered.

So you see, just the mere existence of the Bible threatens the cult of environmentalism and Al Gore! So naturally, any mention of the Bible is a danger!

In regards to polar bears:
As to whether polar bears are increasing or decreasing in numbers, I thought I found a citation of proof that polar bears are decreasing (source), but when I tried to read the "expert" opinion, it was all a bunch of double speak that first said that the claims that they are increasing are absolutely false, then says that there aren't really hard data that gives the original numbers - which should mean that you could neither prove or disprove the population increase or decrease. But that's ok, because here's an article from an area that actually has polar bears, that gives a clearer example of why they say the numbers are increasing.

Fire the Global Warming Terrorists

This is a very succinct definition of Terrorism:

The systematic use of terror, the deliberate creation and exploitation of fear for bringing about political change.

Source: Preparing Nurses for Disaster Management

That sure sounds like the Global Warming fearmongering tactics! Praise be to Al Gore!

Seriously, why are people falling into this trap? Why are we handing out awards to fiction? Why are we allowing Gore and others like him to cripple our economy?

There are a multitude of sources for the truth about Global Warming. The ones that aren't being funded by the very organizations that profit off of Global Warming Terrorism.

If you want to hear the truth about Global Warming, I'd suggest starting with reading Michael Crichton's State of Fear. Or going to his website and looking at some of what he's written, but really, there are so many credible sources out there that aren't being funded by organizations that have a vested interest in the terroristic tactics of the Global Warming pundits.

The Case For Skepticism on Global Warming
Environmentalism as Religion
or how about - Founder of the Weather Channel Calls Global Warming Greatest Scam in History